Kurato

Mailchimp Alternative in Europe: 5 Newsletter Tools Compared for GDPR

With Mailchimp you pay for contacts, not for newsletters, including the 3,000 dead addresses you haven't mailed in two years, and your list is stored in the US. We compare five alternatives, show where each one keeps your data, and work out when a switch pays off.

There's a moment almost every Mailchimp customer knows: the list has grown to a few thousand addresses over the years, the newsletter goes out maybe every six weeks, and the monthly bill keeps climbing anyway. That isn't a flaw in the system, it is the system: billing is per contact, not per send. An address you will never write to again costs exactly as much as your best customer.

That's the most common reason people go looking for a Mailchimp alternative. For businesses in Europe there's a second one: where the list is stored. This post sorts through the reasons, introduces five alternatives along with their real limits, and works out the point at which moving makes sense.

We checked every plan and feature claim about the providers on 7 October 2026 against their official pricing, help, and privacy pages; each link sits in the sentence it supports. Email providers change their plans often. Check the provider's current pricing page before you decide.

What Mailchimp customers keep running into

1. The price scales with the wrong number

Mailchimp tiers by contacts. That rewards high sending frequency and punishes well-tended but quiet lists. Two companies with 5,000 addresses each pay the same, whether one mails weekly and the other twice a year. If you communicate seasonally (coaches, event organizers, trades, consultancies), you're subsidizing the heavy senders.

Then there's a detail many people only notice on the invoice. According to Mailchimp's help page on its plans, subscribed, unsubscribed, and non-subscribed contacts all count toward your contact total (as of 7 October 2026). Unless you clean up, you keep paying for people who said no long ago. The free plan ends at 250 contacts and 500 emails a month, according to the pricing page (as of 7 October 2026).

2. Your list leaves Europe

Mailchimp belongs to Intuit, is based in the United States, and transfers personal data from the EU there. On its GDPR page Mailchimp names two safeguards: certification under the EU-US Data Privacy Framework and standard contractual clauses in its data processing addendum (as of 7 October 2026). The framework rests on an adequacy decision the European Commission adopted on 10 July 2023. So it can be done lawfully, but it stays work: a data processing agreement, an entry in your record of processing activities, and a clause in your privacy policy that discloses the transfer to the US. This is an orientation, not legal advice; for your specific case, your lawyer or data protection officer has the last word. Anyone who has been through that once knows the appeal of a setup where the list never leaves your own server. The related question of consent is covered in our post on double opt-in and the GDPR.

3. Moving gets more expensive every year

Addresses can be exported, no argument there. What doesn't come along: automations, segment logic, campaign history, open and click records. The longer a list lives inside one system, the more invisible work is baked into it, and the higher the barrier to leaving. That's not a charge against Mailchimp, it's the nature of tools like this. But it is an argument for making the decision sooner rather than later.

The five alternatives

Brevo: the quick cost lever

Brevo (formerly Sendinblue) flips the pricing model: you pay for email volume, not for the size of your list. According to Brevo's pricing page, the Starter plan begins at 5,000 emails a month, the free plan allows 300 emails a day, and if you send rarely you can buy credits that don't expire (as of 7 October 2026). With 8,000 addresses and six newsletters a year, you pay for 48,000 sent emails instead of twelve months of 8,000 contacts. Behind Brevo is Sendinblue SAS in Paris, and according to its security page the servers are in the EU. The privacy paperwork shrinks noticeably. Limits: the editor is less polished than Mailchimp's, and without a paid plan the daily cap stays. If you want to shed the biggest cost item today without changing your architecture, this is where you land.

MailerLite: lean, with an EU contract partner

MailerLite is the tidy version of classic newsletter SaaS: a good editor, fair prices, pleasantly little ballast. Like Mailchimp, MailerLite bills by subscribers, with sending volume on top. According to MailerLite's pricing page, the free plan covers up to 250 subscribers and 2,500 emails a month (as of 7 October 2026). So the change is one of price, not of model. On data protection MailerLite does better than its reputation: for customers with a billing address in the EEA, the UK, or Switzerland, the contract partner is MailerLite Limited in Dublin, and the data centre is in the EU, according to its privacy policy (as of 7 October 2026). For the AI writing assistants, the same policy names OpenAI and Google as processors; if you use them, add that to your records. For solo operators with a small, active list it's the friendliest environment in the field.

MailPoet: the newsletter inside your WordPress backend

With MailPoet the list moves back into your own installation: subscribers sit in the WordPress database, newsletters are written in the backend, WooCommerce integration included. Sending runs through MailPoet's own Sending Service, your own server, or an SMTP service, your choice. According to MailPoet's pricing page, the free Starter plan covers up to 500 subscribers and 5,000 emails a month; above that, the price follows your subscriber count (as of 7 October 2026). For shops that want order confirmations and newsletters from a single source, MailPoet is the shortest route.

FluentCRM: self-hosted with automations

FluentCRM is the most mature entry in the "CRM inside your own WordPress" category: contacts, tags, lists, proper automation sequences, good integration with course and shop plugins. You pay by the number of websites, not by the size of your list: a single-site licence lists at $129 a year with unlimited contacts on FluentCRM's pricing page (as of 7 October 2026). If you need real branching automations and still want to host them yourself, this is currently the best place to be. Neither FluentCRM's homepage nor its pricing page lists a sales pipeline with deals. Sales work is mapped through tags there.

Kurato: contacts, pipeline, newsletters, and appointments in one place

Our own plugin, so cards on the table. Kurato is the marketing CRM of the Hafenstudios fleet and covers four things that are usually four separate tools: contacts with tags and segments, a sales pipeline as a kanban board, newsletters with double opt-in, unsubscribe, and a preference center, plus appointment booking with ICS files. Everything lives in your WordPress database; no data flows to us.

For sending, Kurato takes the BYO route: you enter the credentials of your own service, such as Brevo, Postmark, Mailgun, SMTP2GO, Amazon SES, or plain SMTP. That sounds like more work, and the first setup is. In exchange you depend on no single provider: if your sending service turns expensive or unreliable, you swap it out without touching the list.

The free version is unusually complete: unlimited contacts, the pipeline, newsletters with double opt-in, appointment booking for one host, and the full set of GDPR tools. Kurato Pro (€99 a year for three websites) adds open and click reporting, AI-drafted copy, unlimited hosts in appointment booking, and a cockpit login for teamwork. Every tier is listed on the pricing page.

And the limits, because they belong in the decision: branching automation sequences are still being built. If you need multi-step welcome journeys with conditions today, FluentCRM or Mailchimp will serve you better. Kurato Pro can also be bought directly; the free version is ready to use right away. And with any self-hosted solution, deliverability remains your job. Google's email sender guidelines require SPF or DKIM from everyone sending to Gmail accounts, and from 5,000 messages a day both, plus DMARC and one-click unsubscribe (as of 7 October 2026). Without those records, even the finest newsletter ends up in the spam folder.

The Europe question: where your list actually lives

"GDPR-compliant" on a vendor's homepage settles very little. The useful questions are narrower: who is your contract partner, and in which country is the list stored? Checked on 7 October 2026, the answers differ more than the marketing suggests.

  • Mailchimp: US company. EU data goes to the US under the Data Privacy Framework and standard contractual clauses.
  • Brevo: French company, servers in the EU.
  • MailerLite: for customers billed in the EEA, the UK, or Switzerland, an Irish contract partner and an EU data centre. The AI writing features involve OpenAI and Google.
  • MailPoet, FluentCRM, Kurato: the list lives in your WordPress database on your server. The sending service you pick sees sending data, not your whole list.

Why this matters even though the framework is in force today: the one before it, the Privacy Shield, was struck down by the Court of Justice of the EU on 16 July 2020 (case C-311/18, known as Schrems II), and businesses relying on it lost that legal basis overnight. A list stored in the EU, or on your own server, doesn't depend on how the next court case goes.

Comparison table

SolutionBillingList livesAutomationsSales pipelineData location
Mailchimpper contact, unsubscribed includedwith the providerextensiverudimentaryUSA (Data Privacy Framework)
Brevoby email volumewith the providersolidyes (CRM module)EU
MailerLiteper subscriberwith the providersolidnoEU (for EEA customers)
MailPoetper subscriberyour own serverbasicnoyour server, sending service of your choice
FluentCRMper websiteyour own serverbranchingvia tagsyour server, sending service of your choice
KuratoFree / €99 a yearyour own serverin progresskanban boardyour server, sending service of your choice

The mistake people make in the cost calculation

Comparisons almost always pit licence against licence, and miss that the cost is made up of three items: tool, sending, and work. A SaaS subscription bundles all three into one number. A self-hosted solution separates them: the plugin costs something once a year, sending runs through a transactional service, and setting up SPF, DKIM, and DMARC costs you one to two hours, once. Amazon SES shows how small the sending item can get: its pricing page lists $0.10 per 1,000 emails (as of 7 October 2026).

Our rule of thumb: below roughly 500 addresses, switching is busywork, so stay where you are. Between 500 and 2,000 addresses, sending frequency decides: if you write rarely, an email-based model like Brevo saves you money immediately. From around 2,000 addresses self-hosting is regularly cheaper, and from 5,000 the gap is wide enough that the migration work pays for itself too.

In short: The right Mailchimp alternative comes down to a single question: are you currently paying for contacts you never mail? If so, the pricing model is your problem, not the tool. Then switching isn't a matter of taste, it's arithmetic.

Newsletters, contacts, and appointments in your own WordPress

Kurato: unlimited contacts, a sales pipeline as a kanban board, newsletters with double opt-in, appointment booking. GDPR-first on your server, sending through your own provider. Free version with no contact limit.

See Kurato

Frequently asked questions

What is the cheapest Mailchimp alternative?

For irregular newsletters Brevo is usually cheapest, because billing is by email volume rather than by contacts. If you send rarely, you can also buy credits there that, according to Brevo, don't expire. With large lists, a self-hosted solution like Kurato or FluentCRM is cheaper in the long run, because licence costs don't grow with the number of addresses.

Is there a European alternative to Mailchimp?

Yes. Brevo is a French company and says its servers are in the EU, and MailerLite names an Irish contract partner and an EU data centre for customers in the EEA (checked on 7 October 2026). A self-hosted tool such as MailPoet, FluentCRM, or Kurato goes one step further, because the list stays on your own server. Sending then runs through a provider of your choice, with whom you sign a data processing agreement.

Can I simply move my Mailchimp contacts?

Addresses and basic fields can be exported as CSV and imported into any other tool. What doesn't come along are automations, segment logic, and campaign history. You have to rebuild those parts in the new system. Important: you must carry over your subscribers' consent in documented form.

Is a self-hosted newsletter safer under the GDPR?

It simplifies the situation considerably, because contact data never leaves your own server and there's no third-country transfer to document. It rarely works entirely without a service provider, though: the actual sending runs through a transactional provider, and you need a data processing agreement with them. What sits with that provider is sending data, not your whole list.

Do I need my own email provider for Kurato?

Yes. Kurato sends through your own account at Brevo, Postmark, Mailgun, SMTP2GO, Amazon SES, or plain SMTP. That keeps you independent of any single provider, but it does mean setting that account up once, including SPF, DKIM, and DMARC records for deliverability.

Can Kurato do multi-step automations like Mailchimp?

Not yet. Branching sequences are on the development list. Today Kurato covers contact management, segments, the sales pipeline, newsletters with double opt-in, and appointment booking. If you need branching welcome journeys with conditions, you're currently better served by FluentCRM or by Mailchimp itself.

Back to blog A post by hafenstudios